# 6 Harry Potter And The Order of the Phoenix

Dear Rache,

This movie, I  saw in Eastwood during a weekend back in 2007, and I watched it again last night, because I remember I had such strong feelings about it.

I actually saw some of my students watching the same movie at that time. Come Monday, some students remembered our little Eastwood encounter with the comment “Harry Potter was boring diba?”

I liked it.

It feels like first Harry Potter film that dared to distance itself from the book and be a movie all its own. A real re-imagination of the book, which really utilized cinematic tricks and techniques to service the story’s splendor and magic, and most of all, its movement.
Take the montage scenes as an obvious example. What the book built up in chapters, the movie unfurled in a series of overlapping scenes and dialogue.

Professor Umbridge’s reign of terror  showed her  flicking her wand to attack students’ bums, scrutinizing Professor Trewlaney’s classes, and that very funny bit when she unfurled a tape measure beside Professor Flitwick. These overlapping scenes all the while infused with  uppity, elevator music. And what about the Daily Prophet montage where the camera zoomed in, on still pictures that came to life to show the shift in power in Hogwarts.

Isn’t there a scene just like that in Citizen Kane? A newspaper picture coming to life. Just like Kane, this movie employed cinema’s inherent tools to its full advantage all in the service of the story. Camera angles, music, special effects.

Never mind that Ron’s first stabs at Quidditch was completely scrapped. Or that Tonks got only a few minutes of screen time. What hampered the first two, Chris Columbus-directed movies was that these movies were so scared to do anything, other than be faithful to the book. So the movies  felt like a pop up version of the book – each scene meticulously faithful to the words on the written page. It was also very also very awkward and self-conscious.

This movie, was a real stand-alone. It focused on the book’s essence – Harry’s journey towards the discovery of the prophecy, and  his torment at the disturbing duality within him.


Not only is this great movie making, you get to see the best that Britain has to offer cinematically – Ralph Fiennes as Voldemort, Imelda Staunton as Professor Umbridge and Emma Thompson as Professor Trewlaney. And Maggie Smith and Allan Rickman, of course.


About 500 Movies for Rache

Rache is one of our friends, who, though smart and wonderful in every way imaginable, is particularly deficient in terms of her film knowledge. Now no friend of ours can be allowed to go on believing that movies such as Batang X and Little Mermaid 2 represent the height of cinematic excellence. And so, it is with a mixture of compassion and messianic complex, that we've decided to watch and review 500 movies for Rache, until March 31, 2011. There are three of us behind this blog, and we have decided that there is only one way to go about the movie-picking and reviewing process: indiscriminately. We will sit through the campy and the compelling, the indie films and the blockbusters, the critics' darlings and the straight-to-video. This is how much we love you Rachel. This is also - let's face it - how much we love ourselves. By March of 2011, we hope to have a good cross-section of cinematic genres, traditions, cultures and periods. (But in all likelihood, it will be mostly Hollywood fare). So Rache, our dear, pretty, wonderful, cinematically-clueless friend, and the many others just like her, THIS BLOG IS FOR YOU.
This entry was posted in Comedy. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s